Re: pg_dumpall -c (7.1 beta 4 buglet) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_dumpall -c (7.1 beta 4 buglet)
Date
Msg-id 200103071516.KAA04464@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dumpall -c (7.1 beta 4 buglet)  ("Rod Taylor" <rod.taylor@inquent.com>)
List pgsql-general
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Doesn't seem right that the DROP DATABASE comes before the individual
> dropping of indicies, tables, etc.  Anyway to reverse this (less
> errors that way).

Can I ask why you would want to use -c with pg_dumpall?  Doesn't
pg_dumpall's database creation make the -c option meaningless?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lisa Goulet
Date:
Subject: Importing data only
Next
From: Boulat Khakimov
Date:
Subject: Re: (blowfish in Postgres) Undefined symbol -- YAY!