Re: vacuum analyze fails: ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 2230924 in catalog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: vacuum analyze fails: ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 2230924 in catalog
Date
Msg-id 20010227134324V.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuum analyze fails: ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 2230924 in catalog  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> > I thought "typeidIsValid(targetTypeId) == false" is better than
> > "!typeidIsValid(targetTypeId)"?
> 
> I've always thought that "== true" and "== false" on something that's
> already a boolean are not good style.  It's a matter of taste I suppose.
> But note that the existing calls on typeidIsValid are coded that way...
> 
>             regards, tom lane

I see.
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum analyze fails: ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 2230924 in catalog
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c