Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?
Date
Msg-id 200101192227.f0JMRbq24013@linda.lfix.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?  (Florent Guillaume <efgeor@noos.fr>)
List pgsql-general
Florent Guillaume wrote:
  >> Unless your application logic tries to use OIDs as row identifiers,
  >> duplicate OIDs in user tables are not a problem.
  >
  >Hmmm, that means that the following, which I use, is not strictly correct :
  >
  >create table t1 (recordid SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, val INT4, name TEXT);
  >... much later ...
  >insert into t1 (val, name) values (3465, 'blah');
  >-- PHP application gets $lastoid for this insert
  >select recordid from t1 where oid = $lastoid;
  >-- PHP application now hast the recordid that was created.
  >
  >Because the last select could return several lines.
  >
  >What would be the correct idiom ? Explicitly use nextval ? That pretty
  >defeats the point of SERIAL, no ?

SELECT currval('t1_recordid_seq');

currval is guaranteed to return the value that the sequence has just put
into recordid.

--
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47  6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
                 ========================================
     "The LORD is my strength and song, and he is become my
      salvation; he is my God, and I will prepare him an
      habitation; my father's God, and I will exalt him."
                       Exodus 15:2



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Craig L. Ching"
Date:
Subject: RE: Re: couple of general questions
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL on startup