Re: fkey + primary key does not work in current - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: fkey + primary key does not work in current
Date
Msg-id 200010170051.UAA25724@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fkey + primary key does not work in current  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: fkey + primary key does not work in current
List pgsql-hackers
Has this been resolved?


> 
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> 
> > It seems that foreign key does not work in current, if specified with
> > primary key definition. Take a look at following example(works in
> > 7.0.2.):
> > 
> > test=# CREATE TABLE PKTABLE ( ptest1 int, ptest2 int, ptest3 int, ptest4 text, PRIMARY KEY(ptest1, ptest2, ptest3)
);
> > NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'pktable_pkey' for table 'pktable'
> > CREATE
> > test=# CREATE TABLE FKTABLE ( ftest1 int, ftest2 int, ftest3 int, ftest4 int, primary key
(ftest1,ftest2,ftest3,ftest4), CONSTRAINT constrname3 FOREIGN KEY(ftest1, ftest2, ftest3) REFERENCES PKTABLE);
 
> > NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'fktable_pkey' for table 'fktable'
> > NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY check(s)
> > ERROR:  columns referenced in foreign key constraint not found.
> 
> Hmm, that's very strange.  I wonder which columns it think didn't exist.
> It shouldn't be checking the pktable in that case, which would imply
> it doesn't believe the existance of ftest1,ftest2,ftest3.  Probably
> a stupid mistake on my part.  As soon as I clear off space to compile
> current, I'll look.
> 
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
Next
From: Mark Hollomon
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: New relkind for views