Re: Re: New relkind for views - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Hollomon
Subject Re: Re: New relkind for views
Date
Msg-id 20001016205301.A975@jupiter
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: New relkind for views  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: Re: New relkind for views
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:41:43PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
> > > 
> > > Also:
> > > 
> > > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
> > 
> > I say let them drop it with either one. 
> 
> I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
> table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
> pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :)
> 
> 

So the vote is now tied. Any other opinions

-- 
Mark Hollomon
mhh@mindspring.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: fkey + primary key does not work in current
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: The lightbulb just went on...