Re: Re: New relkind for views - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Re: New relkind for views
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0010162040510.342-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: New relkind for views  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: New relkind for views]
Re: Re: New relkind for views
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> > > 
> > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
> > 
> > Also:
> > 
> > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
> 
> I say let them drop it with either one. 

I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :)




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PL/Perl compilation error
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: New relkind for views]