> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
>
> > What bothers me is how
> > hard it is to update functions (primarily triggers) in a nice way.
> >
> > Using a procedural language is a lot easier but I find it a real pain to
> > edit functioins created in this way since they're only stored in the
> > database. You have to retrieve them, edit them and then update them.
> >
On 2000-08-17 07:40:36, Bob Parkinson wrote:
> How about keeping the stuff in an external file, then drop the function
> and trigger, and do a psql -d the_database -f the_code to reload.
>
> If you drop functions you must also drop the trigger associated with it
> (it one exists).
Well, yeah, that's pretty much what I meant here:
> > Is there a nice way to keep the source elsewhere and reload it in some
> > simple way? I tried editing database dumps but that feels really bad.
I was hoping for a better way but I guess it works...
(I don't like to have to drop everything just to tune a variable in a
function, (I think) I've seen signs that some things (cached oids?) make
(some) trouble when You do this)
What I'd really like would be something like specifying the source file
where the function is stored when You create the function instead of the
actual code - kinda like You specify an object file when You define a C
function... It doesn't feel like an unreasonable feature to me...
> This bit has been in the archives recently.
I'm having trouble finding it... pointers?
/Daniel (not subscribed)
--
Now take a deep breath, smile and don't take life so seriously... :)
