On 9/20/21 22:14, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it is a bad idea to print additional information as you
>> are suggesting but why only for this error? It could be useful to
>> investigate any other error we get during decoding. I think normally
>> we add such additional information via error_context. We have recently
>> added/enhanced it for apply-workers, see commit [1].
>>
>> I think here we should just print the relation name in the error
>> message you pointed out and then work on adding additional information
>> via error context as a separate patch. What do you think?
>
> Attached please find the patch which just modifies the current error
> message as proposed by you. I am planning to commit it in a day or two
> unless there are comments or any other suggestions.
Looks good to me. I see that I hadn't used the macro for getting the
relation name, thanks for fixing that!
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Schneider
Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services
