On 9/18/20 4:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 9/18/20 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I intentionally let that happen, figuring that it'd be good to get some
>>> buildfarm cycles on the new code in pg_upgrade that does this check.
>>> But now we have to think about updating the test. I think the best
>>> bet is just to add some DROP OPERATOR commands to the existing
>>> cleanup logic in TestUpgradeXversion.pm. It looks like this would
>>> do the trick:
>>>
>>> drop operator #@# (bigint,NONE);
>>> drop operator #%# (bigint,NONE);
>>> drop operator !=- (bigint,NONE);
>>> drop operator #@%# (bigint,NONE);
>> Almost. I had to remove one more operator.
> Hmm, that's not a postfix operator ... oh, it's because it depends on the
> numeric_fac function alias which we also removed. We could eliminate
> the need to drop it if we changed the definition to use "factorial"
> instead of "numeric_fac" in all the back branches. Not sure if that's
> a better solution or not. Might be worth doing, because in the older
> branches that's the only user-defined prefix operator, so we're missing
> some pg_upgrade test coverage if we just drop it.
>
>
Yeah, probably worth doing. It's a small enough change and it's only in
the test suite.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
