Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rakesh Kumar
Subject Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions
Date
Msg-id 1F70E659-7F3A-4F65-86B7-27D794F472D7@aol.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions  (Robert Zenz <robert.zenz@sibvisions.com>)
Responses Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
>
> I'm not sure about the terminology here, though, because the Transaction
> Tutorial (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/tutorial-transactions.html)
> speaks of "aborted" transactions, while you use the term "failed" here.

Purely from a user point of view, shouldn't "aborted" mean a ROLLBACK issues by the application
due to a violation of a business rule, whereas "failed" should mean as a ROLLBACK issues by
PG due to constraint violation or like disk full or whatever.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: session_replication_role meaning?
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions