Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From MauMau
Subject Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Date
Msg-id 1B49CB3D75734A7690C7C08E921D9C3E@maumau
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
List pgsql-hackers
From: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
> There was also the idea that this would be driven off SQLSTATE but this
> seems pretty unwieldy to me.

You are referring to this long discussion, don't you?

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/19791.1335902957@sss.pgh.pa.us

I've read it before, and liked the SQLSTATE-based approach.  It seems like 
properly assigned SQLSTATEs can be used as message IDs, and pairs of 
SQLSTATE and its user action might be utilized to provide sophisticated 
database administration GUI.

That discussion sounds interesting, and I want to take more time to 
consider.  But what do you think of my original suggestion to easily solve 
the current issue?  I'd like to remove the current annoying problem first 
before spending much time for more excited infrastructure.

Regards
MauMau




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dr. Andreas Kunert"
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature request: Logging SSL connections
Next
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: [patch] Client-only installation on Windows