Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze
Date
Msg-id 199910111855.OAA27707@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Wonder how our create index does it.  Seems it is must be similar.
> 
> CREATE INDEX (for btrees) is very similar, and really ought to share
> code.  Someone apparently didn't want to figure out how to generalize
> psort.c to handle index tuples, though.  The CREATE INDEX code is a
> little better for large amounts of data but a lot worse for small
> amounts --- AFAICT it doesn't take any shortcuts, even when everything
> fits in memory.  (I'm sure you've noticed that CREATE INDEX hits the
> disk pretty hard even when the source table is empty :-(.)
> 
> I'm planning to merge the two sets of code and keep the best features of
> both.  I already have some first-draft code that allows them to work
> with >2gig data sets.

Great.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze
Next
From: "Albert REINER"
Date:
Subject: DELETE/DROP and inheritance