> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> In a situation where you've got subselects, it may not be immediately
> >> obvious which FROM list the entry got added to. I can't think of any
> >> simple way of identifying that, however :-(
>
> > Not sure how to handle that either. I could print the subquery level
> > number, or I could say "in subquery" or even go fancy and do "in
> > sub-sub-query" depending on the number of levels down.
>
> That seems like a good idea; it won't help tell the difference between
> two subqueries at the same level, but in a lot of practical cases it
> would tell you what you needed to know, and it won't confuse a novice.
>
> I like the "... in subquery", "... in sub-subquery", etc wording.
>
> BTW, Jan was complaining that a number of the regress tests now "fail"
> because they provoke this message. Should we just update the expected
> outputs, or should we change the tests not to use the feature?
I just looked at it, and I woild be required to loop up through the
pstate->parentParseState counting how many times I can continue going
up, and creating an elog string on the fly to print. Doesn't seem worth
it, does it?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
