> >If we get wide tuples, we could just throw all large objects into one
> >table, and have an on it. We can then vacuum it to compact space, etc.
>
> I thought about that too. But if a table contains lots of LOs,
> scanning of it will take for a long time. On the otherhand, if LOs are
> stored outside the table, scanning time will be shorter as long as we
> don't need to read the content of each LO type field.
Use an index to get to the LO's in the table.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
