Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Subject Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
Date
Msg-id 199803160827.RAA05629@srapc451.sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance  (Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
>hmm.. well until the grammar gets fixed, create table c(c _char)
>should work, as _typename is the typename from an array of that type.
>Although I don't see what advantages a character array has over text?

Good point. I asked him the same question. He needed a chararcter
vector in that each char represents an individual value. Rather than
using substr(), an array might be more intuitive, he said.

>On Mon, 16 March 1998, at 15:20:36, t-ishii@sra.co.jp wrote:
>
>> Please do not remove char2! Some users uses it for making an array of
>> char.
>>
>> create table c(c char2[]);
>>
>> Seems strange? Yes. Actually what he wanted to do was:
>>
>> test=> create table c(c char[]);
>> ERROR:  parser: parse error at or near "["
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii@sra.co.jp

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brett McCormick
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
Next
From: "Luuk de Boer"
Date:
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page