Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brett McCormick
Subject Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
Date
Msg-id 13580.57158.671556.881613@abraxas.scene.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance  (t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance  (t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
List pgsql-hackers
hmm.. well until the grammar gets fixed, create table c(c _char)
should work, as _typename is the typename from an array of that type.
Although I don't see what advantages a character array has over text?

On Mon, 16 March 1998, at 15:20:36, t-ishii@sra.co.jp wrote:

> Please do not remove char2! Some users uses it for making an array of
> char.
>
> create table c(c char2[]);
>
> Seems strange? Yes. Actually what he wanted to do was:
>
> test=> create table c(c char[]);
> ERROR:  parser: parse error at or near "["
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> t-ishii@sra.co.jp

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Vadim B. Mikheev"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
Next
From: t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance