Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page
Date
Msg-id 199802031822.NAA17759@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
>
>
> Nobody likes to take the time to move discussions, do they?  And ya, I'm
> about as guilty *sigh*
>
> Move to pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org...
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, Herouth Maoz wrote:
>
> > At 15:01 +0200 on 2/2/98, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > I think the garbage collection should be separated from the statistics.
> > Garbage collection needs a write lock, statistics only a read lock. If they
> > are not done at the same time, the various tables would be locked for
> > shorter periods.
>
>     Hrmmmm...good point, I think.  Bruce?  Vadim?  When vacuum'ng a
> large table, how much time is spend 'garbage collecting' vs 'statistics'?
> I thought that 'vacuum analyze' *was* the statistics aspect of it?  Where
> just 'vacuum' was only garbage collection...?

This is correct.  Vacuum is fast, vacuum analyze is pretty slow.  We
could separate them, I guess, and that would eliminate the write-lock
and be only a readlock.

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question abou
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page