Re: GUC patch for Win32 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: GUC patch for Win32
Date
Msg-id 19867.1052402390@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC patch for Win32  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
I said:
> That way the file never changes after postmaster start and there can
> be no race condition.  Children will instead have to read
> postgresql.conf for themselves during their launch (after they read the
> nondefault_variables file), but that's an easy one-line addition.

On second thought, that just moves the race condition upstream (to the
person editing postgresql.conf) ... so never mind that idea.  We don't
want any part of Postgres reading postgresql.conf except shortly after
someone has SIGHUP'd the postmaster.

But I'm still wondering if the order of operations in SIGHUP_handler is
wrong.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC patch for Win32
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC patch for Win32