Re: pg_migrator progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_migrator progress
Date
Msg-id 19715.1238262677@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_migrator progress  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_migrator progress  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But having said that, there isn't any real harm in fixing the OID
>> counter to match what it was.  You need to run pg_resetxlog to set the
>> WAL position and XID counter anyway, and it can set the OID counter too.

> FYI, I decided against restoring the oid counter because it might
> collide with an oid assigned during pg_migrator schema creation.

That argument seems pretty empty --- why is it more likely than a
collision happening if you *don't* restore the oid counter?  And why
would it matter anyway?  We fixed the problems with oid collisions
some time ago.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Temporarily (I hope) disable flattening of IN/EXISTS sublinks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tuplestore API problem