Re: RC1 on Friday? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: RC1 on Friday?
Date
Msg-id 19419.1036682413@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RC1 on Friday?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: RC1 on Friday?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: RC1 on Friday?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> Tom, my understanding is that CONVERT stuff required an initdb, and was
> also the only thing 'critical' that went in ... correct?  What impact does
> that have?  For instance, could it cause one of the regression tests to
> fail, or is it something that is relatively benign?

I would like to think it's a pretty safe change, but that's why we do
betas ;-).

More seriously, we are still attacking various portability issues, and
there is still some undone docs work.  I doubt we can make a tarball
tomorrow that is an honest release candidate.  Maybe Monday?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Failed to initialize lc_messages 7.3b5
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a