Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date
Msg-id 19264.1005280525@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Call for objections: revision of keyword classification  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> What does #include do?  Doesn't it work?

AFAICT it's only allowed in the C-code sections of gram.y, from which
it's just transposed into the output .c file (as indeed you'd want;
you wouldn't want your header files expanded when bison is run).

I'm not seeing anything that supports inclusion of a file in the
grammar-productions portion of gram.y.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhanced index details using \d in psql