Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date
Msg-id 19122.1005279566@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Doesn't bison deal with #include?  I guess not.  The only other way is
> to make a gram.y.pre, and have Makefile do the inclusions in the proper
> spot, and run that new gram.y through bison.

I was hoping to avoid that sort of kluge ... surely the bison designers
thought of include, and I'm just not seeing how it's done ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Small FK patch to deal with tables without oids
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification