Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date
Msg-id 200111090431.fA94VJQ17068@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Doesn't bison deal with #include?  I guess not.  The only other way is
> > to make a gram.y.pre, and have Makefile do the inclusions in the proper
> > spot, and run that new gram.y through bison.
>
> I was hoping to avoid that sort of kluge ... surely the bison designers
> thought of include, and I'm just not seeing how it's done ...

What does #include do?  Doesn't it work?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhanced index details using \d in psql
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification