Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Date
Msg-id 1926.1227541480@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Please stick to the convention of including include files in
>> alphabetical order.

> I didn't realize we had such a convention. Is this for all include files or
> only within a directory? Are there exceptions where the order matters or have
> we managed to make sure it doesn't everywhere?

If the order matters, it's a bug in the include files.  Bruce runs a
script periodically to check that no include file depends on anything
except postgres.h (or postgres_fe.h, as appropriate).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Visibility map, partial vacuums