Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Date
Msg-id 87hc5xrvl9.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Please stick to the convention of including include files in
> alphabetical order.

I didn't realize we had such a convention. Is this for all include files or
only within a directory? Are there exceptions where the order matters or have
we managed to make sure it doesn't everywhere?

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about
EnterpriseDB'sPostgreSQL training!
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marko Kreen"
Date:
Subject: Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.