Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
Date
Msg-id 1915923.1732740864@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm very surprised that this was back-patched. I think we should
> revert it from the back-branches before it gets into a minor release.
> It seems like a clear definitional change, which has no business in a
> minor release.

I was troubled by that too.  Maybe this can be painted as a bug fix
but it seems very questionable --- and even if it is, is it worth
the risk of unexpected side-effects?  I'd rather see something that
touches wire-protocol behavior go through a normal beta test cycle.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart