Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 2024-11-27 15:41:14 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 7:42 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:24:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > Tweaks of the tests across multiple stable branches happen all the
> > > time, and adding one specific to 17~ is no big issue.  I'm in the
> > > middle of it but I'm lacking the steam to do so today.  Will likely
> > > finish tomorrow.
> >
> > I've edited the whole, added this extra test based on \syncpipeline in
> > 17~, kept the remaining tests in 14~ where pgbench is able to handle
> > them, and backpatched that down to 13.  Let's see now what we can do
> > with the psql bits.
> 
> I'm very surprised that this was back-patched. I think we should
> revert it from the back-branches before it gets into a minor release.
> It seems like a clear definitional change, which has no business in a
> minor release.

+1