Re: pg_ctl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_ctl
Date
Msg-id 18982.1080144908@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: pg_ctl  (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl
> in C?

Why bother?  I should think that Windows users want to run PG as a service.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl