Re: pg_ctl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_ctl
Date
Msg-id 4061B9BB.9090703@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl
>>in C?
>>
>>
>
>Why bother?  I should think that Windows users want to run PG as a service.
>
>

Not unreasonable. Maybe someone who uses/distributes a commercial
Windows version can inform us about usage patterns. If that's what we
decide we should remove this from the Win32 page:

. Create C version of pg_ctl?

And while on the subject of that page, this issue should now be fixed
with the listen_addresses patch (which I hope someone can verify):

Postmaster must be started with -i flag, or with tcpip_socket = true in
postgresql.conf, else the postmaster will fail to start and issue the
following error:
|LOG: select() failed in postmaster: No such file or directory


cheers


andrew
|

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl