Re: pg_ctl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From David Garamond
Subject Re: pg_ctl
Date
Msg-id 4061EC1E.9020001@zara.6.isreserved.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Tom Lane wrote:
>>Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl
>>in C?
>
> Why bother?  I should think that Windows users want to run PG as a service.

Except when a non administrator wants to run his own PG instance.

--
dave


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl