Re: pg_ctl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_ctl
Date
Msg-id 4061AF1A.9090907@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_ctl  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Back on December 1st I wrote:

>
>
> I suspect this work is actually a bit premature, and would best be
> done after we have a working Win32 postmaster. After all, you can
> happily run postgres without ever calling pg_ctl - it's a convenience
> rather than an absolute necessity (unlike initdb). On Windows,
> production users probably wouldn't use it at all - they would use the
> service manager, I should think.
>
>

Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl
in C?

(And has anyone looked at putting in service manager hooks?)

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: connect error
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl