Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?
Date
Msg-id 18892.981419964@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?  ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes:
> "Nic Ferrier" wrote:
>>>> - the postmaster was being started without nohup
> If postmaster is being started by init, it should not need nohup, because
> init never exits and postmaster is not going to get shutdown unexpectedly.

On the other hand, when pg_ctl is invoked by hand, it probably is a bug
that it fails to use nohup.  Perhaps this is a reason why pg_ctl should
not be made into a substitute for a startup script?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Oliver Elphick"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we modify 'text *' passed to a C function?