Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?
Date
Msg-id 200102052256.f15MuDw05746@linda.lfix.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?  ("Nic Ferrier" <nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Nic Ferrier" wrote: >- the postmaster was being started without nohup
If postmaster is being started by init, it should not need nohup, because
init never exits and postmaster is not going to get shutdown unexpectedly.

nohup has a performance cost, in that (at least on Linux) it automatically
nices (lowers the priority of) the process.  You may not want the
priority lowered...

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47  6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================   "Lift up your heads, O ye gates; and be ye lift up, ye      everlasting
doors;and the King of glory shall come      in. Who is this King of glory? The LORD strong and      mighty, the LORD
mightyin battle."                                             Psalms 24:7,8 
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump data integrity & java
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken?