Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Date
Msg-id 1863.1552165593@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> writes:
> Hope about  keeping the default unit of ms, but converting it to a 
> 'double' for input, but storing it as int (or long?) number of 
> nanoseconds.  Gives finer grain of control withouthaving to specify a 
> unit, while still allowing calculations to be fast?

Don't really see the point.  The only places where we do any calculations
with the value are where we're about to sleep, so shaving a few nanosec
doesn't seem very interesting.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement