Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

10 March 2019

• 00:04   Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Tom Lane
• 00:06   Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Tom Lane
• 00:17   Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement Pavel Stehule
• 00:27   Re: PATCH: Include all columns in default names for foreign key constraints. Paul Martinez
• 01:14   Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Tom Lane
• 03:41   Re: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? Paul A Jungwirth
• 07:49   Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take Dmitry Dolgov
• 07:54   Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take Andres Freund
• 09:42   Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? David Steele
• 09:55   Re: Feature: temporary materialized views David Steele
• 10:15   Re: Patch to document base64 encoding Fabien COELHO
• 11:14   what makes the PL cursor life-cycle must be in the same transaction? Andy Fan
• 11:34   Re: Performance issue in foreign-key-aware join estimation David Rowley
• 11:39   Re: Covering GiST indexes Alexander Korotkov
• 12:53   Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? David Rowley
• 13:20   Re: dropdb --force Filip Rembiałkowski
• 13:51   Re: jsonpath Alexander Korotkov
• 13:53   Re: Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional Filip Rembiałkowski
• 14:08   Re: Performance issue in foreign-key-aware join estimation David Rowley
• 14:13   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Sergei Kornilov
• 14:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" testpending solution of its timing is (fwd) Fabien COELHO
• 15:13   Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database Julien Rouhaud
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists Dean Rasheed
• 16:10   Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Julien Rouhaud
• 16:18   Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Julien Rouhaud
• 16:26   Re: Add missing CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS table_name AS EXECUTE query; Ramanarayana
• 16:55   Re: Batch insert in CTAS/MatView code Paul Guo
• 17:09   Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:16   Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables John Naylor
• 18:25   Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? Justin Pryzby
• 18:47   Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Tom Lane
• 18:56   Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Julien Rouhaud
• 18:57   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists Dean Rasheed
• 19:29   Re: Binary upgrade from <12 to 12 creates toast table forpartitioned tables Alvaro Herrera
• 19:39   Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement Pavel Stehule
• 19:40   Re: GiST VACUUM Andrey Borodin
• 19:42   Re: Covering GiST indexes Andrey Borodin
• 20:11   Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions? John Naylor
• 20:36   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists Tomas Vondra
• 20:43   Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] David Fetter
• 21:40   Re: subscriptionCheck failures on nightjar Andrew Dunstan
• 21:53   Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons Peter Geoghegan
• 21:58   Re: Batch insert in CTAS/MatView code David Fetter
• 22:53   Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons Heikki Linnakangas
• 23:09   Re: performance issue in remove_from_unowned_list() Alvaro Herrera
• 23:11   Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons Peter Geoghegan
• 23:58   Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Tom Lane