Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id 18371.1352231105@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2  (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> writes:
> Em 06-11-2012 17:24, Tom Lane escreveu:
>> Can you put together a self-contained test case to duplicate these
>> results?  I'm prepared to believe there's some sort of planner
>> regression involved here, but we'll never find it without a test case.

> I'd love to, but I'm afraid I won't have time to do this any time soon.
> Maybe on Sunday. I'll see if I can get a script to generate the database
> on Sunday and hope for it to replicate the issue.

> Would you mind if I coded it using Ruby? (can you run Ruby code in your
> computer?) I mean, for filling with some sample data.

No objection.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Increasing work_mem and shared_buffers on Postgres 9.2 significantly slows down queries
Next
From: "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Increasing work_mem and shared_buffers on Postgres 9.2 significantly slows down queries