Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 11:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> So you were thinking of beta for May 1?
> Rather than picking an arbitrary date for the beta, wouldn't it make
> more sense to simply put out the beta when a particular set of features
> are finished (say, Win32 + PITR + ...)
We did that for 7.1, and again in 7.2; and it was a bad mistake both
times, because we found ourselves in a state where "it's almost done
except X" --- and no one except the person working on X could really
do any further development.
For 7.3 we agreed to set a firm feature-freeze cutoff date well in
advance. That worked a *lot* better, and I'd like to stick with that
approach.
I don't actually much care whether the cutoff is May 1 or June 1 or
whatever. But I want it set in advance, and stuck to, so that people
can plan their own efforts without wondering what will be happening.
regards, tom lane
