I would store sensitive data encrypted in the database. Check the pgcrypto module.
Kiriakos
On Mar 18, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Janning Vygen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on postgresql 9.1 and loving it!
>
> Sometimes we need a full database dump to test some performance issues with real data.
>
> Of course we don't like to have sensible data like bunches of e-mail addresses on our development machines as they
areof no interest for developers and should be kept secure.
>
> So we need an anonymized database dump. I thought about a few ways to achieve this.
>
> 1. Best solution would be a special db user and some rules which fire on reading some tables and replace privacy data
withsome random data. Now doing a dump as this special user doesn't even copy the sensible data at all. The user just
hasa different view on this database even when he calls pg_dump.
>
> But as rules are not fired on COPY it can't work, right?
>
> 2. The other solution I can think of is something like
>
> pg_dump | sed > pgdump_anon
>
> where 'sed' does a lot of magical replace operations on the content of the dump. I don't think this is going to work
reliable.
>
> 3. More reliable would be to dump the database, restore it on a different server, run some sql script which randomize
somedata, and dump it again. hmm, seems to be the only reliable way so far. But it is no fun when dumping and restoring
takesan hour.
>
> Does anybody has a better idea how to achieve an anonymized database dump?
>
> regards
> Janning
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kicktipp GmbH
>
> Venloer Straße 8, 40477 Düsseldorf
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Düsseldorf
> Geschäftsführung: Janning Vygen
> Handelsregister Düsseldorf: HRB 55639
>
> http://www.kicktipp.de/
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
