BUG #17839: Heap-buffer overflow on float8_to_char with invalid template - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From PG Bug reporting form
Subject BUG #17839: Heap-buffer overflow on float8_to_char with invalid template
Date
Msg-id 17839-aada50db24d7b0da@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: BUG #17839: Heap-buffer overflow on float8_to_char with invalid template
List pgsql-bugs
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      17839
Logged by:          Thiago Nunes
Email address:      thiagotnunes@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 15.2
Operating system:   Linux
Description:

Heap-buffer overflow on float8_to_char when format exceeds max double
digits. I noticed this when running tests with memory sanitiser (msan).

The following example triggers the failure (considering max double digits
`DBL_DIG` is 15):

```
float8_to_char(12345678901, "FM9999999999D999990")
```

Explanation below:

1. After parsing the format, `Num.pre` will be 10, `Num.post` will be 6
`Num.zero_end` will be 16
(https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_15_2/src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c#L1196-L1228)
2. The template size is greater than the `DBL_DIG`, `Num.post` will be moved
back here
(https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_15_2/src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c#L6688-L6689).
3. The shortened template with the max `DBL_DIG` will be "stringfied" out
here
(https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_15_2/src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c#L6712-L6717).
The result will be "##########.####" (10 significant digits + '.' + 4
decimal digits).
4. `Np->last_relevant` will be lesser than `Num->zero_end`, so it is updated
to an invalid position in the result above (pointer + 16) here
(https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_15_2/src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c#L5740-L5743).
5. When applying FILLMODE here
(https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_15_2/src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c#L5563),
it will try to get the character at Np->last_relevant, which is out of
bounds.


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17837: The potential risks associated with executing "commit" in a procedure.
Next
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: ERROR: PlaceHolderVar found where not expected