Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
Date
Msg-id 17501.1308199652@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
List pgsql-hackers
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu> writes:
> As an operations guy, the idea of an upgrade using a random,
> non-repeatable port selection gives me the hebejeebees.

Yeah, I agree.  The latest version of the patch doesn't appear to have
any random component to it, though --- it just expects the user to
provide port numbers as switches.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY