Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
Date
Msg-id 1308199236.30501.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On ons, 2011-06-15 at 22:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (FWIW, I've come around to liking the idea of using =~ and the obvious
> variants of that for regex operators, mainly because of the Perl
> precedent.)

Maybe I'm not completely up to date on this, but I observe that Perl
itself doesn't appear to have a commutator for =~ .

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users