Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list
Date
Msg-id 17122.1137438665@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers"  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers"  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers"  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-www
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> As someone else suggested, do we want to set Reply-To on that list as
> well, to redirect discussions to -hackers?

I don't think we should try to force that to happen.  A fair part of the
followup threads in -committers aren't really very interesting and need
not go to -hackers.  Another problem with adding Reply-To is that by
default a copy will *not* go personally to the particular committer,
which is something that you usually do want to happen when commenting
on a commit.

(BTW, have we yet got things fixed so that all the addresses that appear
as "From:" for committers actually work to forward mail to the
respective person?  Last I checked it seemed not to work for me or
Bruce, but that was awhile ago.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers"
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Press email list