Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history
Date
Msg-id 1636512.1638308113@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:12:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Interesting.  I can probably adjust my MUA to send "text/x-patch",
>> but I'll have to look around to see where that's determined.

> I would be interesting to know if "text/x-patch" is better than
> "text/x-diff" --- I currently use the later.

I found out that where that is coming from is "file -i", so I'm a
bit loath to modify it.  Is there any hard documentation as to why
"text/x-patch" should be preferred?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history