Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Date
Msg-id 162867790808180205o4102e1e8q6397ede36b747d3e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Responses Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures  ("Asko Oja" <ascoja@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2008/8/18 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 18 août 2008, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
>> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> This is not the kind of patch we put into stable branches.
>>
>> So what? That is not the only criterion for backpatching.
>
> I fail to understand why this problem is not qualified as a bug.
>

Does it change of result some queries? It is protection to server's hang?

> Regards,
> --
> dim
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
Next
From: leiyonghua
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres-R