>
> This read-only table is modified (delete + insert) by a trigger
> function set on another table, but this second trigger calls the first
> and I can modify my read-only table. I'd like my "read-only" trigger
> to be aware that the modification call on the read-only table comes
> from the second trigger. Is it possible?
PostgreSQL call triggers in alphabet order
>
> I have read in some places that I should use a rule instead, but I
> never used them and it seems complex. I would prefer not to set up
> complex access rules with GRANT and REVOKE because my access rules in
> simple and works now. The best solution I can think of so far is to
> have the client application work with a view, but having this behavior
> fully managed through triggers would be more natural and I fear I
> missed something in the docs.
>
it's depend on application
Pavel
> > Regards
> > Pavel Stehule
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
