Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion
Date
Msg-id 162626420228.1167.13414583689741111142.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_rewind race condition just after promotion  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
Implements feature:       tested, passed
Spec compliant:           tested, passed
Documentation:            tested, passed

The v3 patch LGTM. I wonder if we should explicitly say in pg_rewind tests that
they _don't_ have to call `checkpoint`, or otherwise, we will lose the test
coverage for this scenario. But I don't have a strong opinion on this one.

The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhance traceability of wal_level changes for backup management
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Toast compression method options