Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments
Date
Msg-id 16240.22635.390707.785148@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
>>>>> "BM" == Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

BM> restore, even if there is no value to it being large during normal
BM> server operation.  Should that be decumented?


Yes, right alongside the recommendation to bump sort_mem, even though
in my tests sort_mem made no significant difference in restore time
going from 8m to 128m.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments
Next
From: Dennis Bjorklund
Date:
Subject: Re: LIKE query running slow