Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Date
Msg-id 15994.1110236199@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with  (John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with  (John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com>)
List pgsql-performance
John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com> writes:
> Dave Held wrote:
>> There is always clock().

> My experience with clock() on win32 is that CLOCKS_PER_SEC was 1000, and
> it had a resolution of 55clocks / s. When I just did this:

The other problem is it measures process CPU time, not elapsed time
which is probably more significant for our purposes.

Which brings up a question: just what does QueryPerformanceCounter
measure?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: John A Meinel
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with