Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

8 March 2005

• 01:30   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Dave Held
• 01:34   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Dave Held
• 01:48   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with John A Meinel
• 01:56   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Tom Lane
• 02:15   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Greg Stark
• 03:12   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Dave Held
• 03:29   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Dave Held
• 04:38   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Steinar H. Gunderson
• 05:02   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Tom Lane
• 05:06   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Steinar H. Gunderson
• 06:53   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with PFC
• 07:25   adding 'limit' leads to very slow query Michael McFarland
• 07:25   Help with slow running query jesse d
• 07:26   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Dave Page
• 07:26   performance problems Michael Zoephel
• 07:36   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with John A Meinel
• 07:46   Re: adding 'limit' leads to very slow query John A Meinel
• 10:03   Re: adding 'limit' leads to very slow query Stephan Szabo
• 10:47   Re: Tuning, configuration for 7.3.5 on a Sun E4500 
• 12:05   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with Magnus Hagander
• 13:32   bad plan Gaetano Mendola
• 14:40   Re: bad plan Richard Huxton
• 15:20   pl/pgsql faster than raw SQL? Markus Bertheau ☭
• 15:22   Re: bad plan Gaetano Mendola
• 15:48   Re: pl/pgsql faster than raw SQL? Richard Huxton
• 16:20   Re: bad plan Richard Huxton
• 18:10   Re: pl/pgsql faster than raw SQL? John A Meinel
• 20:11   Re: Tuning, configuration for 7.3.5 on a Sun E4500 Josh Berkus
• 21:35   Re: bad plan Gaetano Mendola
• 21:36   index scan on =, but not < ? Rick Schumeyer
• 21:52   Re: index scan on =, but not < ? Thomas F.O'Connell
• 22:01   Re: index scan on =, but not < ? John Arbash Meinel
• 22:02   Re: index scan on =, but not < ? Rick Schumeyer
• 22:05   Re: index scan on =, but not < ? Dennis Bjorklund
• 22:20   Re: bad plan Richard Huxton
• 23:01   Re: bad plan Tom Lane
• 23:14   Why would writes to pgsql_tmp bottleneck at 1mb/s? Josh Berkus
• 23:25   Re: bad plan Richard Huxton
• 23:42   Re: bad plan Tom Lane