Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id 15781.1352223387@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2  (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> Problem could also be no statistics (run ANALYZE to test) or some
> other configuration problem (like index locale), or a bona fide
> regression.

I'm wondering about join_collapse_limit in particular --- if that wasn't
cranked up in the 9.1 installation, it would be pure luck if you got a
good query plan for an example like this.  Maybe that and/or other
parameter settings didn't get transposed to the 9.2 installation.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas